This weekend, from a woman whose opinion I have always treasured, I've
been learning some excellent lessons about pumpkin pants. She is a
theatrical costume designer of substantial experience. The subject was
trunk hose, about which I had read the following: Trunk hose and slops
can be paned or pansied, with panels of fabric over an inner lining.
Pansied slop is a bulbous hose with a layer of fabric strips from
waistband to leg. These are called "pumpkin" pants.
She replied that pumpkin breeches are not always slops: "Slops are
similar in that they are also big, balloon-y shorts that can have
slashes and panes in them, but slops predate pumpkin breeches and are
both less structured and usually hit lower on the thigh. Pumpkin
breeches hit quite high on the leg and are much more structured. Slops
were more drapey."
I wanted to try on a pair, but was wary of going to a clothing store and
asking for pumpkin pants with pansied slop. Who knows what that'd get
me in this day and age? So I did the next best thing. I got out my
sketchbook and headed back to the 16th century. I even made myself a
little younger and better-looking for the trip. As you can see by the
middle figure in the doodle above, I also got a doublet and wacky hat
thrown in.
Not only did I feel as silly as I looked, the outfit inspired me to
greater curiosity. So I cast my thoughts a hundred years ahead, to the
late 17th century. There I met two handsome fellows. One on the left is a
French peasant. On the right is a mounted gendarme. Fashionwise, both
appeared to have been thrown together at random --frills, sashes,
hangy-down things all over them-- which argues in favor of evolution.
But I had my suspicions.
Both wore frock coats of considerable length, with distracting amounts
of buttons. Gendarme had high, broad boots and peasant had a skirt on.
These boys were hiding something! What? I decided I did not want to
know, but suspected they had pumpkin pants somewhere. This would argue
pumpkin pants were part of their creation. Concealment suggests creation
and evolution equally.
I brought these findings forward to my authority, who pronounced my
trunk hose slopless. She said:"I have a less precise visual shorthand
for differentiating between the two: slops=Pirate pants; pumpkin
breeches=Shakespeare." This meant I would have to backtrack, prior
to 1564 --Shakespeare's birth year-- to get any idea of proper slops. I
decided to go lie down instead.
However, this question is by no means settled: Pumpkin pants, created or
evolved? There is much to do and more data to collect. Data is
important! Except for my gendarme using a (at the time, uninvented)
snaffle bit to control his dinosaur, my account is historically correct.
But did slops disappear or evolve into disguise? Until I am rested
enough to deal with pirates, I must be content to live with the mystery.
http://www.google.com/search?q=pumpkin+pants&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a
And when I went to Google images, oh là là:
http://www.google.com/images?q=pumpkin+pants&oe=utf-8&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a&um=1&ie=UTF-8&source=og&sa=N&hl=en&tab=wi&biw=1680&bih=897
Looking forward to more! Thank you informed informant!